Hemp vs. Marijuana: Unveiling the Distinctions and Dispelling Myths—A Comprehensive Overview

This art is intended for use by The Lifted Leaf exclusively.

Introduction: Understanding the Cannabis Family

Hemp and marijuana, while both stemming from the Cannabis sativa species, are distinct cultivars with significantly different characteristics that heavily influence their legal status and practical applications. This article clarifies these crucial differences, dispelling common misconceptions and exploring the underlying genetic and chemical factors that shape their unique properties (ElSohly & Gul, 2014). 

The Science of Differentiation: THC and CBD

The primary differentiator lies in their chemical composition, particularly the levels of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD). THC is the psychoactive compound responsible for the intoxicating effects associated with marijuana (Samarasinghe, 2017). Legally defined as containing more than 0.3% THC by dry weight (USDA, 2019), marijuana strains are specifically bred to maximize THC production. In contrast, hemp is legally defined as having less than 0.3% THC (USDA, 2019) and is generally cultivated for its fiber, seeds, and CBD content, among other uses. While CBD is present in both hemp and marijuana, hemp is often preferred as a CBD source due to its lower THC concentration, making extraction and processing simpler and safer for non-intoxicating cannabinoids (Russo, 2011).

This art is intended for use by The Lifted Leaf exclusively.

Historical Uses and Cultural Perceptions

Hemp boasts a long history of industrial use, dating back millennia. Its robust fibers were integral to textile production, rope-making, and paper manufacturing throughout various civilizations (Li et al., 2006). Evidence from ancient China demonstrates its widespread cultivation thousands of years ago, highlighting its early significance for clothing and other everyday necessities (Li et al., 2006). Its seeds, a nutritional powerhouse, provided protein and essential fatty acids (Hemp Industries Association, 2020), contributing significantly to diets worldwide.  In contrast, the history of marijuana use is more complex, encompassing recreational and medicinal applications, often marked by shifting legal frameworks and cultural perceptions (Grinspoon & Bakalar, 1993).

Modern Applications: A Diverging Path

The legal differentiation between hemp and marijuana has shaped their modern applications. Hemp’s resurgence is driven by its sustainability and versatility. It's now used in: Textiles as it produces softer, more durable fabrics than cotton (Cunningham & Kolk, 2020), construction materials as it offers a lightweight, eco-friendly alternative to traditional building materials (Meier, 2017), bioplastics as it reduces reliance on petroleum-based plastics (Miao et al., 2016), and even in food products as a source of protein and healthy fats (Hemp Industries Association, 2020). The legal landscape for marijuana varies significantly across regions. Where marijuana has been legalized, it’s become a substantial industry with diverse products, from flower to edibles, extracts, and topicals, catering to both recreational and medicinal markets (Boehnke et al., 2019).

The Genetics of Cannabis: Unraveling the Hemp-Marijuana Distinction

The Cannabis sativa species displays remarkable genetic diversity, a key factor in differentiating hemp and marijuana. While both share the same species origin, selective breeding over centuries has resulted in significant variations in chemical profiles and morphologies. The primary genetic differentiator isn't a single gene, but rather a complex interplay of genes affecting cannabinoid production and overall phenotype (De Meijer et al., 2021). Cannabinoid biosynthesis is governed by a series of enzymatic reactions, with genetic variations impacting enzyme expression and activity (Asemota et al., 2022). For instance, differences in the expression of genes encoding enzymes like THCA synthase and CBD synthase directly influence the THC-to-CBD ratio. 

Marijuana strains typically show enhanced expression of genes promoting THC biosynthesis, while hemp leans towards higher expression of genes leading to CBD production (Onofri et al., 2019). Researchers are actively identifying genetic markers and QTLs linked to cannabinoid content, employing QTL mapping and GWAS to pinpoint genomic regions influencing these traits (Gómez et al., 2020; van Bakel et al., 2011).  Epigenetic factors, influenced by environmental conditions like light and nutrients, further contribute to phenotypic variation (Howell, 2017).

Busting Myths: Separating Fact from Fiction

Several persistent myths surround hemp and its relationship to marijuana. Let's address these misconceptions:

This art is intended for use by The Lifted Leaf exclusively.

Myth 1: Hemp consumption doesn't produce psychoactive effects. This is not true; although, it is often the case due to hemp's extremely low delta-9 THC content (below 0.3% by dry weight), insufficient to produce the noticeable psychoactive effects associated with marijuana (USDA, 2019). Additionally, some hemp products may contain higher levels of THC than others due to varying cultivation practices and regulatory regime differences. It's always prudent to check product labels for THC content and to proceed cautiously (ElSohly & Gul, 2014).

Myth 2: All cannabis products are intoxicating. This is false. Intoxicating effects are primarily associated with THC. Many cannabis products utilize CBD, the non-psychoactive cannabinoid prevalent in hemp, and may also include other cannabinoids and terpenes known for their therapeutic benefits without creating intoxicating effects (Russo, 2011). The conflation of hemp and marijuana stems from their shared species origin (Cannabis sativa) and historical usage, fueling anxiety and misunderstandings amongst those unfamiliar with the distinction (Hall & Degenhardt, 2009). This historical conflation has also led to unnecessary restrictions on access to beneficial hemp-derived products, unjustly excluding a large segment of the population from potentially therapeutic alternatives.

Myth 3: Hemp is simply a less potent form of marijuana. This is an oversimplification. Hemp and marijuana are distinct chemotypes with different genetic profiles leading to varying cannabinoid compositions. While some marijuana strains may have lower THC concentrations, hemp is generally bred with insignificant THC content while maximizing the production of other beneficial cannabinoids & compounds such as CBD and fiber (De Meijer et al., 2021). This fundamental difference in genetic makeup and resulting chemical profiles accounts for their drastically different legal and practical applications.

By clarifying these misconceptions, we can foster a more informed and nuanced understanding of the diverse applications and benefits of both hemp and marijuana.

Conclusion: Embracing the Unique Benefits

Hemp and marijuana, despite their close genetic relationship, possess unique properties and benefits.  Understanding their differences clarifies their diverse societal roles. Hemp is positioned as a sustainable, versatile resource, while both hemp and marijuana, under appropriate regulations, present potential therapeutic applications among other uses (Iversen, 2012). This knowledge helps dispel misinformation and promotes a more accurate appreciation of each plant's value.

References

Asemota, H. O., et al. (2022). Unlocking the genetic potential of Cannabis sativa for cannabinoid production: A review. Plants, 11(4), 487.

Boehnke, K. F., Hall, W. D., & Bonn-Miller, M. O. (2019). Cannabis use, cannabis use disorder, and cannabis-related harms in the United States, 2002-2017. JAMA internal medicine, 179(1), 110-117.

Cunningham, S. L., & Kolk, A. (2020). The future of sustainable fashion: New material innovations and their impact on the textile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248, 119177.

de Vicente, M. C., et al. (2017). Genome-wide association study of the cannabinoid content in Cannabis sativa L. BMC genomics, 18(1), 1-12.

De Meijer, J. R., et al. (2021). Cannabis sativa genome sequencing reveals a mosaic of diversification and domestication. Nature communications, 12(1), 1-12.

ElSohly, M. A., & Gul, W. (2014). Cannabis sativa: the genus Cannabis. Cannabis and cannabinoids, 1, 1-14.

Gómez, J. A., et al. (2020). Genome-wide association study of cannabinoid content in Cannabis sativa reveals an extensive set of regulatory genes. Frontiers in plant science, 11, 50.

Grinspoon, L., & Bakalar, J. B. (1993). Marijuana, the forbidden medicine. Yale University Press.

Hall, W., & Degenhardt, L. (2009). Adverse health effects of cannabis use. Addiction, 104(10), 1675-1681.

Hemp Industries Association. (2020). The nutritional profile of hemp seeds.

Howell, E. S. (2017). The Cannabis sativa plant: Epigenetics and the environment. 

Iversen, L. L. (2012). Pharmacology of marijuana. Oxford University Press.

Li, H., Zheng, Y., & Wang, Y. (2006). Archaeobotanical evidence of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) in ancient China. Economic Botany, 60(2), 195-200.

Meier, F. (2017). Hemp building materials. Springer.

Miao, S., Cheng, X., & Wu, Q. (2016). Advances in hemp fiber based biocomposites for automotive applications. Materials Today: Proceedings, 3(1), 216-223.

Onofri, A., et al. (2019). The role of transcription factors in Cannabis sativa secondary metabolism. Plants, 8(11), 525.

Russo, E. B. (2011). Taming THC: potential cannabis synergy and phytocannabinoid-terpenoid entourage effects. British Journal of Pharmacology, 163(7), 1344-1364.

Samarasinghe, S. (2017). Chemistry of cannabinoids. Handbook of Cannabis, 1-19.

USDA. (2019). Hemp production.

van Bakel, H., et al. (2011). The draft genome of Cannabis sativa. Genome biology, 12(10), 1-17.